Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2022 article

Clinical Characteristics and Histopathology in Suspected Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections

4Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : no, se. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are severe diseases with high morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis is challenging. Several guidelines recommend tissue biopsies as an adjunct diagnostic in routine management, but neither biopsy sampling nor classification is standardized or validated. We studied the quality of tissue biopsy examination as part of routine diagnostics in NSTIs. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing surgery due to suspected NSTIs in which tissue biopsy was taken as part of routine management. Clinical data were reviewed. The biopsies were evaluated according to a proposed histopathologic classification system and independently assessed by 2 pathologists. Interrater reliability and diagnostic accuracy were determined. Results Tissue biopsies from 75 patients were examined, 55 NSTIs and 20 non-NSTIs cases. The cohorts were similar in clinical characteristics. Interrater reliability for histopathologic staging was moderate (0.53) and fair (0.37) for diagnosis. The sensitivity of histologic diagnosis was 75% and the specificity 80%. The positive predictive value was 91% and the negative predictive value 53%. Necrotizing Infection Clinical Composite Endpoint (NICCE) success was associated with a more severe histological stage, achieved by 42% and 71% of the cases in stage 1 and 2, respectively (P = .046). Conclusions Our findings suggest that tissue biopsies have low clinical accuracy. The interrater reliability among experienced pathologists is only fair to moderate. A histopathologically more severe stage was associated with favorable outcome. These findings discourage the use of histopathologic evaluation as part of contemporary management of patients with suspected NSTI.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Clinical Characteristics and Histopathology in Suspected Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections
Date Crossref
01/11/2022
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Haukeland University Hospital Department of Medicine pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • University of Bergen Department of Clinical Science pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Karolinska University Hospital Department of Medicine pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Karolinska Institutet pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Department of Medicine — Haukeland University Hospital, Department of Clinical Science — University of Bergen et Department of Medicine — Karolinska University Hospital, avec 1 autre affiliation.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Streptococcal Infections and TreatmentsOrthopedic Infections and TreatmentsOtolaryngology and Infectious Diseases

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.