Aller au contenu principal
2022 article

A High Rate of Inaccuracies Exists When Looking at Reported Conflicts of Interest in the Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Literature

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: To systematically review the accuracy of self-reported conflicts of interest (COI) among trans-carotid artery revascularization (TCAR) studies and evaluate factors associated with increased discrepancies. METHODS: A literature search identified all TCAR-related studies with at least one American author published between January 2017 - December 2020. Industry payments from Silk Road Medical, Inc. were collected using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) Open Payments database. COI discrepancies were identified by comparing author disclosure statements with payments found for the year of publication and year prior (24-month period). Risk factors for COI discrepancy were evaluated at the study and author level. RESULTS: A total of 79 studies (472 authors) were identified. Sixty-four studies (81%) had at least one author receive Silk Road Medical payments. Fifty-eight (73%) studies had at least one author receive an undeclared payment. Consulting fees represented the majority of payment sub-type (85%). Authors who accurately disclosed payments received significantly higher median payments compared to authors who did not accurately disclose payments ($37,222 [IQR: $28,203 - $132,589] vs $1,748 [IQR $257 - $35,041], p < 0.0001). Senior authors were significantly more likely to have a COI discrepancy compared to first authors (p = 0.0219). CONCLUSION: The majority of TCAR-related did not accurately declare COI. Authors with accurate disclosures received higher payments. Senior authors were more likely to have inaccuracies compared to first authors. This study highlights the need for increased efforts to improve the transparency of industry sponsorship, especially when consulting authors are reporting results on patient outcomes.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
A High Rate of Inaccuracies Exists When Looking at Reported Conflicts of Interest in the Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Literature
Date Crossref
17/10/2022
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Pharmaceutical industry and healthcareAcademic Publishing and Open Access

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.