P-028 POSTOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PAIN AFTER LICHTENSTEIN TENSION-FREE MESH INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background-Aim Effective postoperative pain management is vital for the well being of the patients after inguinal hernia repair. The aim of this study was to assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of parecoxib sodium versus diclofenac sodium following inguinal hernia repair. Material & Methods Patients that underwent from 1/1/2019 to 31/12/2020 an Lichtenstein tension free inguinal hernia repair at General Hospital of Amfissa were included in this study, They were randomly assigned to receive postoperatively parecoxib 40mg twice daily iv (group A), or diclofenac 75mg twice daily im (Group B). Tramadol 50mg iv was used as “rescue” treatment. Pain Rating System (PRS) was utilized for pain assessment. Results 214 patients (162 males, 52 females) with a mean age of 72 (26–93) years were included in this study. Patients receiving parecoxib sodium experienced significantly lower PRS scores at 6 hours postoperatively (2.2 vs 3.1) and 24hrs postoperatively (1.2 vs 2.0). Fifty-nine patients (27.8%) needed a “rescue” analgesic treatment with the majority of them (43 patients) belonging to the Group B. 96.7% of total patients left the hospital on 1st postoperative day without needing any additional analgesic treatment. Conclusions Administration of parecoxib sodium 40mg twice daily is more effective than diclofenac for pain management after inguinal hernia repair.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- P-028 POSTOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PAIN AFTER LICHTENSTEIN TENSION-FREE MESH INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2022
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.