Experience of liver transplantation in the regional clinical hospital
Rattachement africain : ru. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The purpose of the study is to summarize the first experience of liver transplants. Material and methods. Liver transplantation was performed at the Regional Clinical Hospital. 5 liver transplants from a posthumous donor were performed. Based on the available data, the analysis was carried out according to the following criteria: gender, age, MELD- Na index, cause of liver cirrhosis, method of liver transplantation, duration of surgery, postoperative complications, average bed-day, outcome. Results. In total, 5 liver transplants were performed from a posthumous donor. Among the patients there was 1 man and 4 women. The age of men is 41 years, women are 55.4 ± 9.2 years on average. The MELD- Na index is from 15 to 28, on average 17.8 ± 5.1. When transplanting a cadaveric liver, the method of classical orthotopic liver transplantation was used in 4 cases, in one the piggyback technique was used. The duration of surgical intervention in minutes averaged 394 ± 17.4. Postoperative complications on the Clavien-Dindo scale ranged from I to IIIb. The average bed-day of the patient’s stay in the hospital is 20.2 ± 8.9, including 6.2 ± 1.7 days in the intensive care unit. In all 5 cases, the outcome of liver transplantation is satisfactory. Conclusion. The first results of liver transplantation on the basis of the Regional Clinical Hospital showed that performing such a level of operations is possible in a multidisciplinary medical institution.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Experience of liver transplantation in the regional clinical hospital
- Date Crossref
- 07/10/2022
- Éditeur
- LLC Global Media Technology
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.