Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2022 peer-review

Comment on essd-2022-328

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
98Institutions déclarées
17Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : fr, gb, no, ch, de, nl, au, us, it, ca, bm, ie, at, be, jp, cn, se. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere in a changing climate is critical to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe and synthesize data sets and methodologies to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO 2 emissions ( E FOS ) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land-use change ( E LUC ), mainly deforestation, are based on land use and land-use change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO 2 concentration is measured directly, and its growth rate ( G ATM ) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO 2 sink ( S OCEAN ) is estimated with global ocean biogeochemistry models and observation-based data products. The terrestrial CO 2 sink ( S LAND ) is estimated with dynamic global vegetation models. The resulting carbon budget imbalance ( B IM ), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ± 1 σ . For the year 2021, E FOS increased by 5.1 % relative to 2020, with fossil emissions at 10.1 ± 0.5 GtC yr −1 (9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr −1 when the cement carbonation sink is included), and E LUC was 1.1 ± 0.7 GtC yr −1 , for a total anthropogenic CO 2 emission (including the cement carbonation sink) of 10.9 ± 0.8 GtC yr −1 (40.0 ± 2.9 GtCO 2 ). Also, for 2021, G ATM was 5.2 ± 0.2 GtC yr −1 (2.5 ± 0.1 ppm yr −1 ), S OCEAN was 2.9 ± 0.4 GtC yr −1 , and S LAND was 3.5 ± 0.9 GtC yr −1 , with a B IM of − 0.6 GtC yr −1 (i.e. the total estimated sources were too low or sinks were too high). The global atmospheric CO 2 concentration averaged over 2021 reached 414.71 ± 0.1 ppm. Preliminary data for 2022 suggest an increase in E FOS relative to 2021 of + 1.0 % (0.1 % to 1.9 %) globally and atmospheric CO 2 concentration reaching 417.2 ppm, more than 50 % above pre-industrial levels (around 278 ppm). Overall, the mean and trend in the components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959–2021, but discrepancies of up to 1 GtC yr −1 persist for the representation of annual to semi-decadal variability in CO 2 fluxes. Comparison of estimates from multiple approaches and observations shows (1) a persistent large uncertainty in the estimate of land-use change emissions, (2) a low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO 2 flux in the northern extratropics, and (3) a discrepancy between the different methods on the strength of the ocean sink over the last decade. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget and the progress in understanding of the global carbon cycle compared with previous publications of this data set. The data presented in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2022 (Friedlingstein et al., 2022b).

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comment on essd-2022-328
Date Crossref
07/10/2022
Éditeur
Copernicus GmbH
Type
peer-review

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueÉcole PolytechniqueUniversity of ExeterUniversité Paris Sciences et LettresSorbonne UniversitéLaboratoire de Météorologie DynamiqueInstitut Pierre-Simon LaplaceUniversity of East AngliaNorwich Research ParkTyndall CentreCICERO Center for International Climate ResearchETH ZurichInstitute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant DynamicsAlfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und MeeresforschungWageningen University & ResearchBjerknes Centre for Climate ResearchUniversity of BergenUniversity of GroningenMax Planck Institute for MeteorologyLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenCSIRO Oceans and AtmosphereUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-YvelinesCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesUniversité Paris-SaclayLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'EnvironnementCEA Paris-SaclayForest InstituteStanford UniversityNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNOAA Pacific Marine Environmental LaboratoryJoint Research CentreKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaBermuda Institute of Ocean SciencesNational Oceanography CentreUniversity of SouthamptonUniversity of ReadingLeibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research WarnemündeUniversity of Maryland, College ParkMarine InstituteTula FoundationHakai InstituteInternational Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisFlanders Marine InstituteLamont-Doherty Earth ObservatoryColumbia UniversityAppalachian State UniversityWoodwell Climate Research CenterJapan Meteorological AgencyUniversity of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignInstitute of Applied EnergyNSF National Center for Atmospheric ResearchNSF NCAR Climate and Global Dynamics LaboratoryUtrecht UniversityWestern Sydney UniversityLaboratoire d'Océanographie et du Climat : Expérimentations et Approches NumériquesInstitut de Recherche pour le DéveloppementJet Propulsion LaboratoryTsinghua UniversityUniversity of Alaska FairbanksCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental SciencesUniversity of Colorado BoulderNational Institute for Environmental StudiesUniversity of WashingtonJapan Fisheries Research and Education AgencyNational Centre for Earth ObservationUniversity of EdinburghBoston CollegeAuburn UniversityNOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological LaboratoriesGoddard Space Flight CenterPrinceton UniversityMet OfficeMax Planck Institute for BiogeochemistryUniversity of MiamiNORCE Research ASUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-PyrénéesCentre National de Recherches MétéorologiquesMétéo-FranceGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research KielUniversity of BernOeschger Centre for Climate Change ResearchInstitute of Arctic and Alpine ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesInstitute of Tibetan Plateau ResearchUniversity of TasmaniaAustralian Antarctic DivisionMeteorological Research InstituteFood and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsVrije Universiteit AmsterdamOak Ridge National LaboratorySheldon Jackson CollegeSwedish Meteorological and Hydrological InstituteSun Yat-sen UniversityInstitute of Soil and Water ConservationNorthwest A&F UniversityNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyTsinghua–Berkeley Shenzhen Institute

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Atmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesAtmospheric Ozone and Climate

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.