Corrigendum: Increased anxiety from fear of Omicron in China as compared to North America and Western Europe: A cross-sectional Kendall's tau-b analysis using the generalized anxiety disorder 7-item questionnaire
Résumé fourni par la source
Statement: In the published article, there was a mistake in the Full text. The mistake was displayed as "892 females and 192 males" in the current published article. The correct statement should be "688 females and 812 males''. During the Proof stage, we were totally focused on proofreading the wording and grammar and Table/Figures of the manuscript, but forgot to check the statistical data in the full text (we even forgot how we calculated it, as you can see 892+192 will not be 1500 participants we recruited). And the current statement "688 females + 812 males = 1500", which is consistent with our actual sample size and also with the data displayed in the Figure/Tables of our article.Although this error obviously does not affect any other parts of our article (including the conclusion), we just now found this mistake and hope we could do something to minimize any influence caused by this error. We are extremely sorry for this carelessness.In the published article, there was an error. [a statistical error -892 females and 192 males]. As a reference, the incorrect sentence have been marked in yellow in the above screenshot of our currently published article.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Corrigendum: Increased anxiety from fear of Omicron in China as compared to North America and Western Europe: A cross-sectional Kendall's tau-b analysis using the generalized anxiety disorder 7-item questionnaire
- Date Crossref
- 06/10/2022
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.