A 9-Year-old Boy With Fever, Eosinophilia, and Neurologic Symptoms
Rattachement africain : br. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
A 9-year-old male patient from Belo Horizonte, Brazil, presented to the Emergency Department with diarrhea, abdominal pain, coughing and vomiting for 7 days. The patient reported having swum in an artesian well 30 days before and developed a maculopapular rash on the limbs 15 days later. On physical examination, he was tachypneic and hypoxemic (peripheral O2 saturation: 92%) with expiratory wheezing. He received salbutamol and ipratropium, prednisone and O2 and was admitted to a referral hospital (Hospital Infantil João Paulo II, FHEMIG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil). Upon admission, a complete blood count showed a white blood cell count of 38.1 × 109/L with eosinophilia of 23.6 × 109/L eosinophils, 8.4 × 109/L neutrophils, 3.5 × 109/L lymphocytes, 1.9 × 109/L monocytes, and 0.7 × 109/L basophils, hemoglobin of 12.2 g/dL, and platelet count of 143 × 109/L. On the second day of hospitalization, he developed progressive irritability, enuresis, mental confusion and lower limb paresis and was transferred to the intensive care unit. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showed 1 white blood cell per mm3, glucose of 63 mg/100 mL and protein <10 mg/100 mL. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed multiple areas of signal alteration involving white and gray matter, located supra and infratentorially, in the semioval centers, in both periventricular and subcortical areas, as well as in the thalamus, basal ganglia, and cerebellum. Such areas were characterized by hyperintensity on T2/FLAIR, discrete hyperintense signal on T1 before contrast, and diffusion restriction and contrast enhancement, without mass effect (Fig. 1). Although diffuse, the distribution of the lesions correlated with the areas of vascular borders, suggesting the possibility of small areas of infarction (“watershed infarction”).FIGURE 1.: Brain MRI—In the first line (A1–4), axial diffusion weighted sequence showing multiple areas of restriction to diffusion in the semioval centers, in both periventricular and subcortical areas, as well as in the right cerebellar hemisphere. In the second line (B1–4), axial T2-weighted sequence in the same levels of images A1–4, the areas disclose hyperintense signal. In the third line (C1–4), axial gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted sequence in the same levels of the images above, some areas demonstrate contrast enhancement. MRI indicates magnetic resonance imaging.Due to the epidemiologic history, clinical presentation and laboratory results, an additional study was performed which revealed the diagnosis. For Denouement see P. 863. DENOUEMENT (Pediatr Infect Dis J 2022;41:863)Continued from P. 862. Given the epidemiologic history of contact with natural waters and the finding of extreme peripheral eosinophilia, it was important to consider the possibility of parasitic diseases, especially schistosomiasis. Indirect immunofluorescence for schistosomiasis was positive (1:64). Stool parasitologic examination did not reveal any parasites, and testing for circulating cathodic antigen of schistosome (CCA) in urine was negative. A presumptive diagnosis of Schistosoma mansoni infestation was made based on the clinical picture, epidemiologic history, peripheral eosinophilia, positive serology, absence of any other diagnosis, and good response to treatment with praziquantel (60 mg/kg in a single dose), pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (20 mg/kg/day) for 5 days, followed by oral prednisone (1 mg/kg/day) for 6 weeks, with resolution of symptoms. Schistosomiasis is a parasitosis caused by trematode worms of the genus Schistosoma. It is one of the most prevalent parasitic infections in the world, being an important public health problem in tropical countries.1 Six species are capable of infecting humans: S. mansoni, S. haematobium and S. japonicum are the most widely distributed species and S. mekongi, S. guineensis and S. intercalatum are described in limited areas.2,3 In Brazil, the disease is exclusively caused by S. mansoni, and it is estimated that 6 million Brazilians are infected with this parasite.3 A high index of suspicion of the disease in schistosome endemic regions is necessary, even if the clinical picture is not congruent with the “classic” presentation of schistosomiasis.1 The initial infection of a child with schistosomiasis can occur as soon as the first contact with freshwater, infested with cercariae, and ectopic presentations are commonly found in travelers or individuals with single exposure to freshwater.4,5 Classically, the highest prevalence and symptoms of active infection occur in adolescents and young people, decreasing in adulthood.1,6 Early schistosomiasis manifests within the first 2–3 months after exposure. This is the time required for the adult worm to mature and start laying eggs, which occurs approximately 4–6 weeks after infection with S. mansoni, subsequently triggering an initial hyperimmune response by the host.3,4 Two nonspecific clinical presentations of early S. mansoni are cercarial dermatitis and the acute toxemic form.3 In travelers, a history of a self-limited urticarial eruption, minutes to hours after exposure to freshwater, is highly suggestive of cercarial dermatitis.4 The acute toxemic form is a serum sickness-like syndrome with an acute onset characterized by fever, abdominal pain, rash and eosinophilia 4–6 weeks after exposure to freshwater. Cough, diarrhea, visceromegaly and other less common manifestations may also be observed.4,6 A history of cercarial dermatitis preceding the clinical picture is a strong indication of schistosomiasis; however, its absence does not rule out the diagnosis.5 Likewise, the absence of eggs in the feces or nonreactive serologic tests are not enough to rule out the infection in patients with a history of contact with contaminated water in endemic regions.7 Serologic testing is more helpful in the evaluation of nonimmune individuals; however, in an endemic area, it may be difficult to interpret the results since antibody-based tests can remain positive for many years even after successful treatment. This makes it difficult to differentiate ongoing infection from past infections.4,6 Neuroschistosomiasis (NS) is an ectopic manifestation that results from the involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) and constitutes the most frequent and disabling ectopic form of the parasitosis.2 Lesions can occur in the meninges, spinal cord or brain, clinically manifesting as meningomyeloradiculitis or as cerebral or spinal cord pseudotumor. These ectopic forms are severe conditions, and their prognosis depends especially on early treatment. Most cases are caused by S. mansoni, S. haematobium or S. japonicum. The first 2 species have a predilection for the spinal cord and the last 1 for the brain.2 The disease can result from the direct deposition of eggs into the CNS or indirectly from the deposition of circulating immune complexes in small vessels in the CNS. Diagnosis is based on clinical, epidemiologic and laboratory data.7 Although not completely understood, there is evidence that parasite eggs in the CNS and the host immune response are key to the pathogenesis of NS. In most patients, CNS involvement occurs in the acute phase of the infection, as observed in the present case.8 The main mechanism by which eggs reach the CNS is via migration of the adult worm to the CNS by retrograde blood flow from the portal system to the Batson’s vertebral venous plexus and then to CNS veins, where oviposition takes place. The numerous eggs induce a granulomatous response in circumscribed areas, producing a mass effect. In addition, neurologic injury due to immune-mediated vasculitis has also been described.3,7,9 NS may rarely present as acute encephalopathy in tropical regions.7 Neurologic symptoms such as headache, altered mental status, seizures, paresis and ataxia occur about 3 weeks after the acute infection. Although it is most often caused by S. japonicum, cases of encephalopathy attributed to S. mansoni an
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A 9-Year-old Boy With Fever, Eosinophilia, and Neurologic Symptoms
- Date Crossref
- 20/09/2022
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais From the *Faculdade de Medicina pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Fundação Hospitalar do Estado de Minas Gerais pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Hospital Infantil João Paulo II pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
From the *Faculdade de Medicina — Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Fundação Hospitalar do Estado de Minas Gerais et Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, avec 1 autre affiliation.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.