Methylprednisolone use in children with severe pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2
Rattachement africain : tr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and optimal use of corticosteroids in children with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study and included patients (aged<18 years) with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who received standard doses (2–4 mg/kg/day) and high doses (>250 mg/day) of methylprednisolone (MPZ). We adjusted for patients on steroid treatments with a propensity score and patient survival. Results: Fifty-nine patients were included: 61% were male, the median age was 8 (interquartile range [IQR], 2–15) years. The overall survival was 84.4% in patients treated with standard-dose MPZ (n = 45, 76.3%) and 92.2% in patients treated with high-dose MPZ (n = 14, 23.7%; p = 0.67). The demographic, clinical, and laboratory data didn’t differ significantly after propensity score matching, apart from bradycardia, which was a prominent feature of the high-dose group. The clinical and radiological response rates on Day 7 were higher and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) was lower in the high-dose group. Conclusion: Pulse MPZ treatment seems to result in better clinical and radiological responses, with less need for IMV, although the mortality rate doesn’t differ between standard and high-dose regimens of MPZ.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Methylprednisolone use in children with severe pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2
- Date Crossref
- 03/10/2022
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.