Aller au contenu principal
2022 article

229. CARBON-13 BREATH TEST AS AN INVESTIGATIVE TOOL FOR DELAYED CONDUIT EMPTYING AFTER AN OESOPHAGECTOMY

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract The gold standard for diagnosing delayed conduit emptying (DCE) after an oesophagectomy is with scintigraphy. Current practice of using chest radiographs (CXR) and nasogastric tube (NG) output to diagnose DCE is useful clinically but is not as accurate as scintigraphy. A radiation-free procedure with higher accuracy that can be easily carried out at the bedside is needed. We proposal that the carbon-13 breath test is a viable option. Oesophagectomy patients without pyloroplasty were recruited prospectively from 05/12/2017 to 31/12/2019 at a single centre. Age, gender, BMI, ASA grade, smoking status, and conduit size were used. DCE was diagnosed using parameters determined from CXRs and NG output described previously (1). At day 4/5/6, patients were fasted 6 hours prior to consumption of 100 mL of 193 kcal ice-cream laced with carbon-13 octanoic acid. Breath was captured at times 0, then every 30 minutes up to 4 hours and analysed using a gas spectrometer. Carbon-13 half-life excretion (t½) and estimated maximum excretion (tmax) was calculated using the formulas by Ghoos et al (2). There were 65 patients with 24 DCE patients. Apart from gender (p = 0.015), there were no differences in demographics between DCE and non-DCE patients. Differences were seen in both t½ and tmax. T½ was 3.04 hours [95%CI (2.91, 3.52)], and 3.54 hours [95%CI (3.41, 5.39)] in non-DCE, and DCE patients, respectively (p = 0.034). At time points 30, 60 and 90-minutes, Carbon-13 excretion were different, with p = 0.04, 0.015, and 0.034, respectively. Tmax was 1.68 hours [95%CI (1.45, 2.04)], and 2.15 hours [95%CI (1.98, 3.24)] in non-DCE, and DCE patients, respectively (p = 0.011). This study has shown that the carbon-13 breath test is a viable tool to diagnose DCE. Further analysis and comparison with scintigraphy is required to validate the test. Although a gas spectrometer was used in this study to analyse patients’ breath, bedside testing devices are currently available and should be used in future studies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
229. CARBON-13 BREATH TEST AS AN INVESTIGATIVE TOOL FOR DELAYED CONDUIT EMPTYING AFTER AN OESOPHAGECTOMY
Date Crossref
01/09/2022
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Esophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentEsophageal and GI PathologyLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.