Clinically Amyopathic Dermatomyositis With Rapid Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease Diagnosed in a Patient on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Résumé fourni par la source
Clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM) is characterized by skin manifestations with minimal to no muscle involvement. It is a unique subset of dermatomyositis, which may create a diagnostic challenge due to its vague presentation. Establishing the diagnosis is crucial as CADM is highly associated with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD), and patients who suffer from thereof have an abysmal prognosis. Herein, we described a case of a 46-year-old male who presented with a history of skin rash and then started to experience shortness of breath. His respiratory symptoms were progressing swiftly and affected his daily life activities. The initial blood tests were normal, but his chest imaging revealed fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. The patient required intubation due to a critical respiratory condition, and later, he needed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). While the patient was connected to an ECMO machine, a bedside open lung biopsy (BOLB) was performed, and the results were in keeping with RP-ILD and CADM. The patient was started on cyclophosphamide without a response, and his chest computed tomography showed acute respiratory distress syndrome. His hospital course was complicated with pneumonia, severe kidney dysfunction requiring dialysis, and candidemia, which resulted in the patient's death.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Clinically Amyopathic Dermatomyositis With Rapid Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease Diagnosed in a Patient on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
- Date Crossref
- 10/08/2022
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.