CHANGE IN CHORIOCAPILLARIS FLOW DEFICITS WITHIN TEARS OF THE RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIUM IMAGED WITH SWEPT-SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY
Rattachement africain : us, ru. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE: Choriocapillaris (CC) flow deficits (FDs) were measured in the areas exposed by tears of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) before and after their onset to determine their change over time. METHODS: Patients enrolled in a prospective, swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) study were retrospectively reviewed for RPE tears, and scans were evaluated before and after RPE tear formation. Choriocapillaris flow deficits were measured within the bed of the tear and within a symmetric control region. RESULTS: Three patients with RPE tears were imaged before tear formation and for at least 16 months afterward. When the baseline and first posttear visit were compared, CC FDs decreased by 1.0% in the tear region and 1.7% in the control region ( P = 0.84). When the 16-month follow-up visits were compared with the first post-RPE tear visits, CC FDs decreased by 1.9% in tear regions and increased by 1.3% in control regions ( P = 0.37). CONCLUSION: No significant changes in CC FDs were observed before and after RPE tear formation and for 16 months afterward, suggesting that CC FDs can be reliably detected in the presence of an intact RPE and the absence of the RPE did not affect CC perfusion for at least 16 months.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- CHANGE IN CHORIOCAPILLARIS FLOW DEFICITS WITHIN TEARS OF THE RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIUM IMAGED WITH SWEPT-SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2022
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.