Mechanical Complications of Sophysa SM8 Shunt in Adult Hydrocephalus: A Monocentric Experience
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Sophysa SM8 is widely used by neurosurgeons in France. Published studies report shunt malfunction rates in adults between 18% and 29%. However, these studies included multiple valve types and thus entailed a serious confounding factor. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the incidence the Sophysa SM8 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt malfunctions in adults. METHODS: We present a retrospective series of adult patients who underwent CSF shunt placement between 2000 and 2013 with Sophysa SM8. RESULTS: In total, 599 patients (329 males and 270 females) were included. The mean age at surgery was 64.15 years (19-90) (SD 16.17; median 68.0). The causes of hydrocephalus were normal pressure hydrocephalus (49%), traumatic hemorrhages (26.5%), tumors (15.7%), cerebral aqueduct stenoses (3%), and arachnoid cysts (2%). The mean follow-up was 3.9 years (0-16) (SD 4.10; median 3 years). The rate of complications was 22.04% (132 of 599). Most frequent causes of complications were disconnection (25%), migration (12.9%), overdrainage (9.1%), and proximal obstruction (6.8%). In 17 cases (12.9%), no failure was diagnosed during revision. Seven infections (5.3%) were reported. The mean delay for the first revision was 1.70 years (0-13.93) (SD 2.67, median 0.35). The risk of shunt failure was 36% at 10 years. Seventeen percent of revisions occurred during the first year after shunt placement. CONCLUSION: Disconnections are a very frequent complication of Sophysa SM8 valve. They are related to the 2-connector system of this valve. Based on these results, we recommend using 1-piece valves.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Mechanical Complications of Sophysa SM8 Shunt in Adult Hydrocephalus: A Monocentric Experience
- Date Crossref
- 11/07/2022
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.