Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2022 article

Meta-Analysis: Outcomes of Surgical and Medical Management of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

33Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes in the published literature on medical and surgical management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). Methods A PubMed and Google Scholar search of articles relating to DFO was performed over the dates of January 1931 to January 2020. Articles that involved Charcot arthropathy, case reports, small case series, review articles, commentaries, nonhuman studies, and non-English articles were excluded. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool was used to rate the bias of each study. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects and inverse variance methods. The search yielded 1192 articles. After review and the removal of articles that did not meet inclusion criteria, 28 articles remained. Eighteen articles were related to the medical management of DFO and 13 articles were related to surgical management. Three articles looked at a combination of medical and surgical management and were included in both groups. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran Q, I2, τ2, and τ. Results The average success rate was 68.2% (range, 17.0%–97.3%) for medical treatment and 85.7% (range, 65.0%–98.8%) for surgical and medical treatment. There were significant inconsistencies in accounting for peripheral arterial disease and peripheral neuropathy. There was significant heterogeneity in outcomes between studies. However, there was a high rate of successful treatment and a wide range between patients with medical treatment and combined surgical and medical treatment. Conclusions Additional properly designed prospective studies with gold-standard references for diagnosing osteomyelitis are needed to help determine whether medical management of DFO can be successful without surgical intervention.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Meta-Analysis: Outcomes of Surgical and Medical Management of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis
Date Crossref
09/08/2022
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • VA North Texas Health Care System pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Department of Orthopaedic Surgery pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • South Western Sydney Local Health District pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • Western Sydney University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Surgical Service pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution
  • Medical Service pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution
  • School of Medicine Infectious Disease and Microbiology pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • South West Sydney Limb Preservation and Wound Research Academic Unit pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution

VA North Texas Health Care System, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery — The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center et Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals, avec 6 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementOrthopedic Infections and TreatmentsPeripheral Artery Disease Management

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.