Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2022 article

Comparison of Salt Iodization Requirements in National Standards with Global Guidelines

4Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Food fortification is the addition of 1 or more micronutrients to commonly consumed foods and is utilized by many countries as a public health intervention to prevent and control micronutrient deficiencies. As iodine deficiency was a major public health issue globally, the WHO developed evidence-based guidelines for the fortification of salt with iodine. The implementation of salt iodization has been highly successful in reducing iodine deficiency disorders worldwide and is recommended as the main strategy to prevent iodine deficiency. Objectives: This analysis compared salt iodization requirements specified in countries' salt standards with WHO 2014 Guidelines on salt fortification. Methods: For countries with mandatory salt iodization legislation, data from the Global Fortification Data Exchange regarding iodine amounts and iodine compounds, to be added to salt per the country standard and corresponding national salt intake quantities, were compared with 2014 WHO Guidelines. Results: As of 4 September 2021, 110 countries with mandatory salt iodization legislation had national salt standards that specified iodine amounts and compounds and salt intake data. All but 1 specified at least 1 recommended iodine compound, but the majority specified higher iodine amounts in salt standards than indicated in the guidelines, taking salt consumption levels into account. Our analysis did not find excess iodine intake as a result; however, we did not have data on the extent of compliance with national salt standards. Conclusions: Existing iodization requirements in salt standards appear to be appropriate for most countries. Countries in which iodine amounts in salt standards are significantly higher than those recommended in the 2014 Guidelines, in particular those with low compliance with national standards or excess iodine intake, may wish to review program process and output indicators and assess whether current iodine amounts in standards would result in excessive intake if implementation was improved.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparison of Salt Iodization Requirements in National Standards with Global Guidelines
Date Crossref
01/08/2022
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Sodium Intake and HealthThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsHuman Health and Disease

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.