Planck 2018 results
Rattachement africain : fr, nl, no, Burundi, gb, it, Afrique du Sud, es, in, pl, us, ca, jp, de, ir, se, au, cn, fi, ch, dk, ru. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies, combining information from the temperature and polarization maps and the lensing reconstruction. Compared to the 2015 results, improved measurements of large-scale polarization allow the reionization optical depth to be measured with higher precision, leading to significant gains in the precision of other correlated parameters. Improved modelling of the small-scale polarization leads to more robust constraints on many parameters, with residual modelling uncertainties estimated to affect them only at the 0.5 σ level. We find good consistency with the standard spatially-flat 6-parameter ΛCDM cosmology having a power-law spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted “base ΛCDM” in this paper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in combination. A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ω b h 2 = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar spectral index n s = 0.965 ± 0.004, and optical depth τ = 0.054 ± 0.007 (in this abstract we quote 68% confidence regions on measured parameters and 95% on upper limits). The angular acoustic scale is measured to 0.03% precision, with 100 θ * = 1.0411 ± 0.0003. These results are only weakly dependent on the cosmological model and remain stable, with somewhat increased errors, in many commonly considered extensions. Assuming the base-ΛCDM cosmology, the inferred (model-dependent) late-Universe parameters are: Hubble constant H 0 = (67.4 ± 0.5) km s −1 Mpc −1 ; matter density parameter Ω m = 0.315 ± 0.007; and matter fluctuation amplitude σ 8 = 0.811 ± 0.006. We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the base-ΛCDM model. Combining with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements (and considering single-parameter extensions) we constrain the effective extra relativistic degrees of freedom to be N eff = 2.99 ± 0.17, in agreement with the Standard Model prediction N eff = 3.046, and find that the neutrino mass is tightly constrained to ∑ m ν < 0.12 eV. The CMB spectra continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudes than predicted in base ΛCDM at over 2 σ , which pulls some parameters that affect the lensing amplitude away from the ΛCDM model; however, this is not supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the background geometry) BAO data. The joint constraint with BAO measurements on spatial curvature is consistent with a flat universe, Ω K = 0.001 ± 0.002. Also combining with Type Ia supernovae (SNe), the dark-energy equation of state parameter is measured to be w 0 = −1.03 ± 0.03, consistent with a cosmological constant. We find no evidence for deviations from a purely power-law primordial spectrum, and combining with data from BAO, BICEP2, and Keck Array data, we place a limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio r 0.002 < 0.06. Standard big-bang nucleosynthesis predictions for the helium and deuterium abundances for the base-ΛCDM cosmology are in excellent agreement with observations. The Planck base-ΛCDM results are in good agreement with BAO, SNe, and some galaxy lensing observations, but in slight tension with the Dark Energy Survey’s combined-probe results including galaxy clustering (which prefers lower fluctuation amplitudes or matter density parameters), and in significant, 3.6 σ , tension with local measurements of the Hubble constant (which prefer a higher value). Simple model extensions that can partially resolve these tensions are not favoured by the Planck data.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- <i>Planck</i> 2018 results
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2020
- Éditeur
- EDP Sciences
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Université Paris-Sud pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Université Paris-Saclay Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Leiden University Institute Lorentz pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Oslo Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Université Paris Sciences et Lettres pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
École Normale Supérieure - PSL pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
École Normale Supérieure Burundi (code pays fourni par la source)Université ou école supérieure
-
University of Cambridge Cavendish Laboratory pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Université Paris-Sud, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale — Université Paris-Saclay, avec 9 autres affiliations. Pays d’affiliation : Burundi, Afrique du Sud.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.