Development and Validation of Deep Learning Transformer Models for Building a Comprehensive and Real-time Trauma Monitoring (Preprint)
Rattachement africain : fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND In order to study the feasibility of setting up a national trauma observatory in France, OBJECTIVE we compared the performance of several automatic language processing methods on a multi-class classification task of unstructured clinical notes. METHODS A total of 69,110 free-text clinical notes related to visits to the emergency departments of the University Hospital of Bordeaux, France, between 2012 and 2019 were manually annotated. Among those clinical notes 22,481 were traumas. We trained 4 transformer models (deep learning models that encompass attention mechanism) and compared them with the TF-IDF (Term- Frequency - Inverse Document Frequency) associated with SVM (Support Vector Machine) method. RESULTS The transformer models consistently performed better than TF-IDF/SVM. Among the transformers, the GPTanam model pre-trained with a French corpus with an additional auto-supervised learning step on 306,368 unlabeled clinical notes showed the best performance with a micro F1-score of 0.969. CONCLUSIONS The transformers proved efficient multi-class classification task on narrative and medical data. Further steps for improvement should focus on abbreviations expansion and multiple outputs multi-class classification.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Development and Validation of Deep Learning Transformer Models for Building a Comprehensive and Real-time Trauma Monitoring (Preprint)
- Date Crossref
- 07/07/2022
- Éditeur
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.