The Impact of Churn on HIV Outcomes in a Southern United States Clinical Cohort
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: Persons with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH) may experience a cycle of engaging and disengaging in care referred to as "churn." While human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) churn is predicted to be more prevalent in the southern United States (US), it has not been well characterized in this region. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving PWH newly establishing care at a large urban clinic in Atlanta, Georgia, from 2012 to 2017, with follow-up data collected through 2019. The primary exposure was churn, defined as a ≥12-month gap between routine clinic visits or viral load (VL) measurements. We compared HIV metrics before and after churn and assessed the risk of future churn or loss to follow-up. Results: < .0001). The 122 PWH having TV on reengagement had delayed time to subsequent viral suppression (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .48-.73]), and PWH returning to care contributed disproportionately to the community viral load (CVL) (proportion of CVL/proportion of patients, 1.96). Churn was not associated with an increased risk of subsequent churn (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.53 [95% CI, .79-2.97]) or loss to follow-up (aOR, 1.04 [95% CI, .60-1.79]). Conclusions: The rate of churn in a southern US clinic was high, and those who experienced churn had increased TV at reentry and disproportionately contributed to the CVL and likely contributing to ongoing HIV transmission.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The Impact of Churn on HIV Outcomes in a Southern United States Clinical Cohort
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2022
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.