P706: ASCIMINIB USE IN CML: THE UK EXPERIENCE
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: Asciminb is an allosteric BCR-ABL1 inhibitor that has been available for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in the United Kingdom under a managed access program (MAP) from Novartis since 2016. Aims: The aim of this project was to share real-world experience of asciminib use in the UK. Methods: Using a national survey proforma (REC reference: 21/HRA/2157), we collated baseline, outcome and toxicity data on 44 patients treated with asciminib in the UK. Responses were assess using BCR-ABL1 IS values and categorised by ELN criteria. Intolerances were reported using CTCAEv5.0 criteria. Results: The median age at treatment was 58 [22-88] years. Vascular comorbidities were seen in 22 (50%) patients, the most frequent being hypertension (n=12, 27%), peripheral vascular disease (n=6, 14%), AF (n=6, 14%) and ischaemic heart disease (n=6, 14%). Chronic kidney disease was present in 7 (16%) patients. All but one patient was in chronic phase at the time of treatment, but tyrosine kinase domain mutations (TKDM) were common prior to treatment initiation (T315I in 11/44 (25%), other TKDM in 8/44 (18%)). The median number of prior TKIs were 4 [2-5], with 44% of prior lines stopped for resistance, and 56% for intolerance. The most recent TKI was discontinued for resistance in 14 (32%) and intolerance in 30 (68%). Eight (18%) patients had developed pleural effusions on a previous TKIs. Most patients had previously received ponatinib (n=30, 68%) which has been discontinued for resistance in 8 (27%) and intolerance in 22 (73%), with 7 (16%) vascular events on treatment. Five (11%) patients had received prior allogeneic stem cell transplant. At the time of data cut-off, 25 (57%) patients remained on treatment with a median treatment duration of 20 [3-51] months. Reason for treatment discontinuation was resistance (n=7, 16%), intolerance (n= 7, 16%), pregnancy (n=1, 2%), treatment-free remission (n=1, 2%) and non-compliance (n=1, 2%). Two patients died whilst on treatment of unrelated causes. The median daily dose delivered was 240mg [20-400] in patients with T315I-TKDM and 80mg [20-80] in others. While 11 patients had no significant response (including those with early treatment discontinuation for intolerance), 23 (53%) patients achieved MR3 or better, with 14 (32%) achieving MR4 or better. Of 9 patients in MR3 or better at asciminib initiation, 3 (33%) did not tolerate treatment, 2 (22%) maintained their response, and 4 (44%) deepened their response by one category or more. The presence of a non-T315I TKDM was associated with a lower incidence of achieving MR3, with 1 of 6 (16%) evaluable patients in this group achieving MR3 or better, compared with 22 of 31 (71%) evaluable patients with no TKDM or a T315I-only TKDM (p=0.04) (Table1). Haematological toxicity was seen in 17 (38%) patients, and was grade 3-4 in 6 (14%) (predominantly anaemia and thrombocytopaenia). Non-haematological toxicity was reported in 19 (43%) patients (most commonly fatigue (n=4), insomnia (n=3), bone pain (n=2), back pain (n=2), nausea (n=2), fluid retention (n=2)), with only 2 (4%) patients experiencing grade 3-4 toxicity (fatigue in both cases). No worsening of baseline vascular co-morbidity or renal dysfunction was noted. One patient developed a new pleural effusion on the 200mg bd dose, which did not recur on dose reduction. Image:Summary/Conclusion: These data show that asciminib is a well-tolerated, effective treatment for patients who are resistant to or intolerant of multiple TKIs, many of whom often have a number of co-morbidities including vascular disease.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- P706: ASCIMINIB USE IN CML: THE UK EXPERIENCE
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2022
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.