Post mortem evaluation of brain edema using quantitative MRI
Rattachement africain : ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The post mortem assessment of brain edema is routinely performed during autopsy by forensic pathologists who evaluate the macroscopically visible signs. In this study, the suitability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for a differentiation between edematous and nonedematous brains was examined as an objective, noninvasive and quantitative rating method. In this study, 22 deceased underwent post mortem in situ MRI prior to regular autopsy. Acquired MRI sequences allowed the computation of the quantitative MRI parameters T1, T2, T2*, fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity for the cortex, white matter and deep gray matter separately. Beside the autopsy results, which represent the gold standard for rating brain edema, also the normalized cerebral weight (NCW) was determined by dividing the brain weight by the intracranial volume as developed by Bauer et al. [10]. For further examination of the relation of MRI parameters with the NCW, linear regression models were calculated. The results revealed highly significant correlations of the MRI parameters T2 and FA with the NCW in the cortex. These combinations additionally showed the best fitting results of the linear regression models. In conclusion, quantitative MRI is suitable for differentiating edematous from nonedematous brains by calculating T2 and FA in the cortex. A post mortem in situ MRI scan of the brain can, besides delivering morphological information, add relevant and objective information on the edema status of the brain prior to autopsy or when no autopsy is ordered.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Post mortem evaluation of brain edema using quantitative MRI
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2022
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.