Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2022 article

P569: GILTERITINIB AND QUIZARTINIB IN RELAPSED/REFRACTORY (R/R) ACUTE MYELOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA (AML) WITH FLT3 MUTATIONS: A REAL-LIFE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY STUDY

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
14Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Patients with R/R AML have poor prognosis. FLT3 mutations worsened the prognosis but offer a targeted therapy. FLT3 inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy in FLT3-positive R/R AML. Aims: The objective of the present study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of Gilteritinib and Quizartinib in R/R FLT3-mutated AML in real-life context. Methods: Between December 2016 and April 2021, 22 patients were treated with Gilteritinib and 5 patients with Quizartinib in 13 centers of the Spanish PETHEMA and CETLAM groups. Results: The median age was 62 years (range 25; 81) and 56% were women. Most patients presented ITD FLT3 (80%), 56% were refractory and 44% were relapsed (CR1 duration ≥6 months in 60%). The 1st line therapy was intensive chemotherapy (78%, 38% with midostaurin) or HMA (22%). A total of 13/27 patients (48%) had previously received a FLT3 inhibitor (midostaurin=6, sorafenib=2, quizartinib=2, midostaurin + crenolanib vs placebo=2 and midostaurin + quizartinib=1). Seventy percent of the patients received >1 line of treatment prior to Gilteritinib/Quizartinib (the most frequent was FLAG-IDA). Compared with diagnosis, patients in R/R had poorer functional status (ECOG<2 88% vs. 73%) but lower leukocyte counts, LDH level and FLT3 ITD ratio (21.5 x109/L vs 4.7x109/L, 563 U/L vs 330 U/L and 0.60 vs 0.42, respectively). Three patients displayed clonal evolution in R/R with acquisition of cytogenetic alterations in patients with altered karyotype at diagnosis and appearance of alterations in patients with normal karyotype. The ORR was 63% (21% CR, 21% CRi and 21% PR) and the median OS was 5.8 (95%CI, 3.8; 7.9) months. Time to achieve better response was 1.8 months (range 0.9;4.1). Eight patients received the FLT3 inhibitor as a bridge to SCT, and six of them were finally transplanted. Gilteritinib dose was 120mg/day, increasing to 200mg/d in 41% of patients (due to lack of response after 28 days). Toxicity was observed in 69% of patients (g3/4 in 30%). Febrile neutropenia was the most frequent toxicity (35%) followed by hepatotoxicity (28%) and QTc prolongation (16%). One patient died of toxicity attributed to Gilteritinib (febrile neutropenia). Summary/Conclusion: Treatment with Gilteritinib and Quizartinib as monotherapy is an effective and tolerable option for patients with R/R FLT3-mutated AML in real-life, with similar response rates and toxicity to those reported in Phase 3 trials, despite the fact that the study population from our series was more heterogeneous.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
P569: GILTERITINIB AND QUIZARTINIB IN RELAPSED/REFRACTORY (R/R) ACUTE MYELOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA (AML) WITH FLT3 MUTATIONS: A REAL-LIFE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY STUDY
Date Crossref
01/06/2022
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.