P1197: AXICABTAGENE CILOLEUCEL (AXI-CEL) IN COMBINATION WITH RITUXIMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF RELAPSED/REFRACTORY (R/R) LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA (LBCL): OUTCOMES OF THE PHASE 2 ZUMA-14 STUDY
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Despite the success of axi-cel, ≈60% of patients have no response or relapse within ~2 y after treatment (Jacobson C, et al. ASH 2021. #1764), highlighting the need for more therapeutic strategies. In preclinical studies, rituximab augmented CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell function and increased tumor reduction and survival in murine models via synergistic targeting with CAR T-cells (Mihara K, et al. Br J Haematol. 2010). Aims: Here, we report outcomes of ZUMA-14, a Phase 2, multicenter study of axi-cel in combination with rituximab in pts with R/R LBCL after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy. Methods: Eligible patients were ≥18 y with R/R LBCL. Patients received one rituximab dose (375 mg/m2) on Day -5, a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine on Days -5, -4, and -3, and a single axi-cel infusion of 2×106 CAR T cells/kg on Day 0. Starting on Day 21 post–axi-cel infusion, patients received 1 rituximab dose every 28 days for up to 5 doses. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed complete response (CR) rate. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and biomarker assessments. The analysis reported here occurred after all treated patients had ≥12 months of follow-up. Results: As of 12/2/21, 27 patients were enrolled, and 26 received axi-cel and ≥1 rituximab dose (15 patients received all 6 rituximab doses); 1 patient discontinued treatment due to an adverse event (AE). Median age was 63 y (range, 38-82), 54% were male, 81% had stage III/IV disease, 62% had extranodal disease, 38% had elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and 85% had an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) ≥1 (35% aaIPI=2). The CR rate was 65% (95% CI, 44%-83%), and the ORR was 88% (95% CI, 70%-98%). With a median follow-up of 17 months, 65% of the patients had ongoing response, with 57% ongoing in CR. Medians for DOR, PFS and OS were not reached. The estimated DOR and PFS rates at 12 months were 64% and 56%, respectively. The estimated 12-month OS rate was 76%, and 6 patients (23%) died of progressive disease. Most patients (92%) experienced Grade ≥3 AEs. Grade ≥3 cytopenias were reported in 85% of patients, with 38% ongoing on Day 30. Grade ≥3 neurologic events (NEs) occurred in 4 patients (15%); there was no Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Median times to onset of CRS and NEs were 4 days (range, 1-7 days) and 6 days (range, 3-32 days), respectively, with median durations of 5 days (range, 2-15 days) and 7 days (range, 1-39 days). No patients experienced myelodysplastic syndrome. Median peak CAR T-cell levels were comparable to the ZUMA-1 pharmacokinetic profile. Immune-modulating cytokines, including granzyme B, IL-6, CXCL10, IFN-γ and IL-2, were induced in patients following axi-cel and rituximab infusion and were more prominently elevated in responders vs non-responders. Peak rituximab levels were also elevated in responders vs non-responders. Summary/Conclusion: Results from ZUMA-14 demonstrated that axi-cel in combination with rituximab elicited a high CR rate and durable PFS with no new safety signals detected in patients with R/R LBCL.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- P1197: AXICABTAGENE CILOLEUCEL (AXI-CEL) IN COMBINATION WITH RITUXIMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF RELAPSED/REFRACTORY (R/R) LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA (LBCL): OUTCOMES OF THE PHASE 2 ZUMA-14 STUDY
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2022
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.