Temporal and spatial frameworks supporting plant responses to vegetation proximity
Rattachement africain : es, ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT After perception of vegetation proximity by the phytochrome photoreceptors, shade-avoider plants initiate a set of responses known as the Shade Avoidance Syndrome (SAS). The shade-induced de-repression of active phytochrome B (phyB) releases the repression imposed over the PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTORs (PIFs). In Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings, this mechanism triggers rapid and massive changes in gene expression, increases auxin production in a SHADE AVOIDANCE 3-dependent manner and promotes hypocotyl elongation. Other components, such as phyA and ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 5 (HY5), also participate in the shade regulation of the hypocotyl elongation response repressing it. However, it is less clear how phyA and HY5 interact with PIFs to regulate this response. Our physiological, genetic, cell biology and transcriptomic analyses showed that these components are organized in two main branches, and incorporate into the model for the regulation of shade-induced hypocotyl elongation the temporal and spatial functional importance of the various SAS regulators analyzed in here. They also indicated that PIFs and HY5, belonging to separate branches, target common genes whose expression is rapidly modulated by shade. This transcriptional relationship, however, changes after longer shade-treatments, suggesting that it is a dynamic convergence point to modulate the hypocotyl elongation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Temporal and spatial frameworks supporting plant responses to vegetation proximity
- Date Crossref
- 16/06/2022
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.