The effect of tropical temperatures on the quality of RNA extracted from stabilized whole blood samples
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background Whole-blood derived transcriptional profiling is widely used in biomarker discovery, immunological research and therapeutic development. Traditional molecular and high-throughput transcriptomic platforms, including molecular assays with quantitative-PCR (qPCR) and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), are dependent upon high-quality, high-quantity and intact RNA. However, collecting high-quality RNA from field studies can be challenging in remote tropical locations due to resource restrictions and logistics of post-collection processing. The current study tested the relative performance of two most widely used whole blood RNA collection systems, PAXgene® and Tempus™, in optimal laboratory conditions as well as suboptimal conditions in tropical field sites, including the effects of extended storage times and high storage temperatures. Results We found that Tempus™ tubes maintained a slightly higher RNA quantity and integrity relative to PAXgene® tubes at suboptimal tropical conditions. Both PAXgene® and Tempus™ tubes gave similar RNA purity (A260/A280). Additionally, we found that Tempus™ tubes preferentially maintained the stability of mRNA transcripts even as RNA quality decreased with storage length and temperature. Conclusions Our results suggest that Tempus™ blood RNA collection tubes are preferable to PAXgene® for whole-blood collection in suboptimal tropical conditions for RNA-based studies in resource-limited settings.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The effect of tropical temperatures on the quality of RNA extracted from stabilized whole blood samples
- Date Crossref
- 15/06/2022
- Éditeur
- Research Square Platform LLC
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.