Early postoperative astigmatism in 2-mm manual small incision cataract surgery with phacofracture
Résumé fourni par la source
Purpose: India's cataract surgery rate has been hovering around a creditable 6000 per million population but the coverage is variable across the geography and demography with sharp urban rural divide. Smaller incisions in manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) with phacofracture have been credited with lower astigmatism and faster recovery, which is especially useful for patients traveling for surgeries. Methods: In this retrospective chart analysis based observational study of 66 eyes, we describe the early postoperative results with 2 mm MSICS with phacofracture. Results: The mean spherical equivalent of the autorefractor measured astigmatic error changed marginally to -0.51 diopters (SD = 0.58) from -0.44 diopters (SD = 0.42) (t = -8.410, P = 0.0) translating to mean change in astigmatism of 0.14 DCyl when the axis was ignored. The keratometric difference between steepest and flattest axis of the anterior surface of the central 3 mm zone of the cornea changed from a mean of 0.89 diopters (SD = 0.55) to 1.39 diopters (SD = 1.03). The visual acuity improved to mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) score of 0.27 (SD = 0.33) at 1 week and 0.007 (SD = 0.04) which corresponds to 6/6P on Snellen's acuity at 1 month or more. Conclusion: A 2 mm MSICS with phacofracture can deliver low astigmatism and good visual recovery in cataract surgery. The study underlines the need for considering the refraction at anterior and posterior corneal interfaces when the triplanar incision with separate interfaces is used.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Early postoperative astigmatism in 2-mm manual small incision cataract surgery with phacofracture
- Date Crossref
- 31/05/2022
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.