Aller au contenu principal
2022 article

Bowel recovery after intra vs extracorporeal anastomosis for oncologic laparoscopic right hemicolectomy within an ERAS protocol: A retrospective study

2Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Objective Restoring bowel continuity after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with an intra-corporeal (IC) rather than an extracorporeal (EC) ileocolic anastomosis, may offer advantages in post-operative recovery. The aim of this study was to compare bowel function recovery between these two techniques, in a context of complete mesocolic excision within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Methods All consecutive patients who underwent oncologic laparoscopic right hemicolectomy from January 2012 until February 2021 in our institution were included in the study. Data were gathered from the prospectively maintained official ERAS (EIAS) database and completed through our institution's electronic health records. The primary endpoint was Prolonged Postoperative Ileus (PPOI), defined as the need to insert a nasogastric tube, or refractory nausea VAS > 4, on or after the third postoperative day. Secondary endpoints were postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay (LoS). Results 122 patients met the inclusion criteria, 36 (30%) had IC, and 86 (70%) EC anastomosis. Baseline characteristics were similar. Operative time was longer in the IC group (197 min (176–223) vs. 160 min (140–189, p<0.001). There was no difference in post-operative morbidity between groups. PPOI occurred in 2 (5.6%) patients in the IC group vs. 10 (11.6%) in the EC group (p=0.306). Patients in the IC group had an earlier first passage of gas (1.5 days (1–2) vs. 2 days (1–3), p=0.035) and stool (2 days (2–4) vs. 3 days (2–4), p=0.029). Upon multivariate analysis, pain VAS scores at 24 h, age and complications Clavien-Dindo >III, but not the anastomotic technique were independent predictors of slower bowel function recovery. IC anastomosis was an independent predictor of lower pain VAS scores at 24 h (OR 0.341, 95%CI [0.151–0.767], p=0.009) and shorter LoS (OR 0.346, 95%CI [0.132–0.910], p=0.031). Conclusion Although IC anastomosis was not significantly associated to lower rates of PPOI, it conferred advantages in terms of less post-operative pain, a trend for faster bowel recovery and shorter LoS at the expense of longer operating times.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Bowel recovery after intra vs extracorporeal anastomosis for oncologic laparoscopic right hemicolectomy within an ERAS protocol: A retrospective study
Date Crossref
31/05/2022
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.