Repeat Imaging to Avoid Surgery: An Initiative to Reduce-Negative Ureteroscopy in Patients with Ureteral Stones
Rattachement africain : ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
What's known on the subject? and What does the study add?Negative ureteroscopy is a clinical occurrence defined by ureteroscopy being performed for a ureteric or renal calculus identified on radiographic imaging pre-operatively, with no calculus ultimately being identified intra-operatively due to the calculus being passed prior to the procedure being performed.This occurrence has been reported in the existing literature with rates between 6.3 and 9.8% in cohorts consisting of patients with both ureteric and renal calculi.The rates of negative ureteroscopy can be reduced by having more timely operative intervention, and by utilizing repeat pre-operative imaging when indicated.Smaller and more distal calculi are more likely to pass prior to intervention and result in a negative ureteroscopy.This study provides further information regarding the rates of negative ureteroscopy in a specific cohort of patients with only ureteric calculi.These patients did have a higher rate of negative ureteroscopy than other populations in the literature.Additionally, patients who were more symptomatic from their stone undergoing more expedited intervention were actually more likely to have passed their stone prior to intervention when compared to patients undergoing delayed intervention.This highlights the need for repeat imaging when available prior to intervention.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Repeat Imaging to Avoid Surgery: An Initiative to Reduce-Negative Ureteroscopy in Patients with Ureteral Stones
- Date Crossref
- 10/06/2022
- Éditeur
- Galenos Yayinevi
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.