Distribution of Radioactive Cesium during Wild Boar Meat Processing

Le résumé fourni par la source

ABSTRACT: Wild boar meat containing radioactive cesium (Cs) of approximately 1,000 Bq/kg (134Cs+137Cs) was processed into bacon, sausage, and ham. To understand the concentration and quantity change of radioactive Cs, the processing factor (Pf) and food processing retention factor (Fr) were calculated. The radioactive Cs quantity in the meat did not reduce during smoking. The dehydration-related meat mass reduction during smoking without decrease of radioactive Cs led to Cs condensation in the bacon compared with the raw rib meat before processing, resulting in a Pf of 1.18. Soaking in liquid, such as pickling in liquid and desalting or boiling in water, effectively removed radioactive Cs by leakage into water. Therefore, the Fr value of the boiled ham produced from a loin meat block through three liquid-soaking processes was 0.27. The Pf value of the boiled ham was 0.30 due to meat block mass reduction after boiling as a result of dehydration, along with protein thermal denaturation-related muscle tissue shrinkage. The steamed ham Fr value was 0.53, because the removal of radioactive Cs was less efficient by steaming than by boiling. The Pf value of the steamed ham was 0.54, almost the same as the Fr value, because the mass decrease rate was the same as the radioactive Cs decrease rate by steaming. The Fr and the Pf values of the boiled sausage, whose processing did not include soaking in the pickling liquid, were 0.64 and 0.62, respectively. Steaming the sausage meat did not remove radioactive Cs during the dehydration-related mass reduction, leading to Fr and Pf values of 1.01 and 1.17, respectively. This study found that processing into boiled ham was the most effective measure for reducing radioactive Cs quantity and concentration in raw meat. Processing into bacon and steamed sausage showed no Cs quantity reduction, with the moisture loss resulting in Cs condensation compared with the raw material.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.