Epidemiological Impact of GII.17 Human Noroviruses Associated With Attachment to Enterocytes
Rattachement africain : fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
For the last 30 years, molecular surveys have shown that human norovirus (HuNoV), predominantly the GII.4 genotype, is one of the main causative agents of gastroenteritis. However, epidemiological surveys have revealed the worldwide emergence of GII.17 HuNoVs. Genetic analysis confirmed that GII.17 strains are distributed into three variants (i.e., Kawasaki 308, Kawasaki 323, and CS-E1). Here, virus-like particles (VLPs) were baculovirus-expressed from these variants to study putative interactions with HBGA. Qualitative analysis of the HBGA binding profile of each variant showed that the most recent and predominant GII.17 variant, Kawasaki 308, possesses a larger binding spectrum. The retrospective study of GII.17 strains documented before the emergence of the dominant Kawasaki 308 variant showed that the emergence of a new GII.17 variant could be related to an increased binding capacity toward HBGA. The use of duodenal histological sections confirmed that recognition of enterocytes involved HBGA for the three GII.17 variants. Finally, we observed that the relative affinity of recent GII.17 VLPs for HBGA remains lower than that of the GII.4-2012 variant. These observations suggest a model whereby a combination of virological factors, such as polymerase fidelity and increased affinity for HBGA, and immunological factors was responsible for the incomplete and non-persistent replacement of GII.4 by new GII.17 variants.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Epidemiological Impact of GII.17 Human Noroviruses Associated With Attachment to Enterocytes
- Date Crossref
- 27/04/2022
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.