Outcomes of Pediatric Patients With Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma Treated With Interval Compression
Rattachement africain : jo. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Interval compression (IC), a regimen of alternating vincristine/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide/etoposide every 2 weeks, improves survival for localized Ewing sarcoma (ES), with uncertain effect on metastatic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the charts of pediatric patients with metastatic ES treated with IC at our center between January 2013 and March 2020. We calculated event-free survival and overall survival (OS) and used log-rank tests for univariate comparisons. RESULTS: We identified 34 patients 2.7 to 17.1 years of age (median: 11.6 y). Twenty-six patients (76%) had pulmonary metastases, and 14 (41%) had extrapulmonary metastases. All patients received local control therapy: surgery only (n=7, 21%), radiotherapy only (n=18, 53%), or both (n=9, 26%). The estimated 3-year OS and event-free survival were 62%±9% and 39%±9%, respectively. Patients with pulmonary-only and extrapulmonary metastasis had a 3-year OS of 88%±8% and 27%±13%, respectively ( P =0.0074). Age group (above vs. below 12 y), or primary tumor site did not affect survival, but local control therapy did (surgery only, 83%±15%; combined surgery and radiation, 30%±18%; radiation only, 15%±10%; P =0.048). CONCLUSION: IC yielded similar outcomes for patients with metastatic ES to other reported regimens. We suggest including this approach to other blocks of therapy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Outcomes of Pediatric Patients With Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma Treated With Interval Compression
- Date Crossref
- 09/05/2022
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.