ACCURACY AND SAFETY OF LOWER GI EUS-GUIDED FNA/FNB: A RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE-CENTER STUDY
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Aims The aim was to analyze the performance characteristics and safety of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/fine needle biopsy (FNA/FNB) via the lower GI tract. Methods Records of 100 patients who were referred for lower GI EUS at a tertiary center between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated EUS FNA/FNB performance by comparing EUS tissue diagnoses with the final diagnosis (obtained via resection / long term follow-up). Results 100 patients underwent lower GI EUS, of which 36 were intended as EUS FNA/FNB. In one patient, the lesion was not visible at EUS. In the remaining 35 patients the lesion was sampled. The most frequent location for EUS FNA/FNB was in the rectum (13/35). The majority of lesions were extraluminal (18/35) i.e. not visible endoscopically, the remainder were subepithelial. There were three mild complications (pain x 2, bleeding). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy of lower GI EUS-FNA/FNB was 93.0%, 71.4%, 93.0%, 88.6% respectively. The EUS FNA/FNB resulted in a change in the pre-EUS diagnosis in 15/35 cases. Conclusions Lower GI EUS-FNA/FNB is an accurate and safe technique. It can be considered for any lesion requiring tissue sampling that is related to the lower GI tract. Publication History Article published online: 14 April 2022 © 2022. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- ACCURACY AND SAFETY OF LOWER GI EUS-GUIDED FNA/FNB: A RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE-CENTER STUDY
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2022
- Éditeur
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.