AMICO galaxy clusters in KiDS-DR3: Constraints on cosmological parameters and on the normalisation of the mass-richness relation from clustering
Rattachement africain : it, gb, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Aims.We analysed the clustering of a photometric sample of galaxy clusters selected from the Third Data Release of the Kilo-Degree Survey, focusing on the redshift-space two-point correlation function (2PCF). We compared our measurements to theoretical predictions of the standard Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmological model. Methods.We measured the 2PCF of the sample in the cluster-centric radial ranger ∈ [5, 80]h−1Mpc, considering 4934 galaxy clusters with richnessλ* ≥ 15 in the redshift rangez ∈ [0.1, 0.6]. A Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis has been performed to constrain the cosmological parameters Ωm,σ8, andS8 ≡ σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5, assuming Gaussian priors on the mass-richness relation given by the posteriors obtained from a joint analysis of cluster counts and weak lensing. In addition, we constrained the normalisation of the mass-richness relation,α, with fixed cosmological parameters. Results.We obtained Ωm= 0.28+0.05−0.04,σ8= 0.82+0.14−0.12, andS8= 0.80+0.08−0.08. The constraint onS8is consistent within 1σwith the results from WMAP andPlanck. Furthermore, by fixing the cosmological parameters to those provided byPlanck, we obtainedα= 0.12+0.06−0.06, which is fully consistent with the result obtained from the joint analysis of cluster counts and weak lensing performed for this sample.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- AMICO galaxy clusters in KiDS-DR3: Constraints on cosmological parameters and on the normalisation of the mass-richness relation from clustering
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2022
- Éditeur
- EDP Sciences
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.