Analysis of synthetic magnetic resonance images by multi-channel segmentation increases accuracy of volumetry in the putamen and decreases mis-segmentation in the dural sinuses

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) using magnetic resonance imaging (MR) has been used to estimate cortical atrophy associated with various diseases. However, there are mis-segmentations of segmented gray matter image in VBM. PURPOSE: To study a twofold evaluation of single- and multi-channel segmentation using synthetic MR images: (1) mis-segmentation of segmented gray matter images in transverse and cavernous sinuses; and (2) accuracy and repeatability of segmented gray matter images. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 13 healthy individuals were scanned with 3D quantification using an interleaved Look-Locker acquisition sequence with a T2 preparation pulse (3D-QALAS) sequence on a 1.5-T scanner. Three of the 13 healthy participants were scanned five consecutive times for evaluation of repeatability. We used SyMRI software to create images with three contrasts: T1-weighted (T1W), T2-weighted (T2W), and proton density-weighted (PDW) images. Manual regions of interest (ROI) on T1W imaging were individually set as the gold standard in the transverse sinus, cavernous sinus, and putamen. Single-channel (T1W) and multi-channel (T1W + T2W, T1W + PDW, and T1W + T2W + PDW imaging) segmentations were performed with statistical parametric mapping 12 software. RESULTS: We found that mis-segmentations in both the transverse and cavernous sinuses were large in single-channel segmentation compared with multi-channel segmentations. Furthermore, the accuracy of segmented gray matter images in the putamen was high in both multi-channel T1W + PDW and T1W + T2W + PDW segmentations compared with other segmentations. Finally, the highest repeatability of left putamen volumetry was found with multi-channel segmentation T1WI + PDWI. CONCLUSION: Multi-channel segmentation with T1WI + PDWI provides good results for VBM compared with single-channel and other multi-channel segmentations.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.