The anesthetic role in implementing a fast-track oncogynecologist surgery protocol. Preliminary results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial

Le résumé fourni par la source

PERIOPERATIVE HYPEROXIA AND LONG TERM MORTALITY UNDER COLORECTAL SURGERYBackground and goal of the studyPerioperative hyperoxia (FiO2>80%) appears to reduce the incidence of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery (CRS) (1). Despite of this benefit, Meyhoff et al. observed an increased long-term mortality in patients receiving hyperoxia during CRS (2). This is a controversial topic, and the goal of this study was to assess long term mortality in our patients submitted to CRS according to the FiO2 received, hyperoxia (FiO2 80%) or standard (FiO2 <50%).Materials and MethodsA retrospective cohort study to assess survival was performed with telephone survey in patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery from October 2011 to December 2013. Follow up date to assess survival status was January 2015.Demographic and surgical variables and cancer staging were analyzed. The main outcome was the mortality in follow up period. Survival in two groups, hyperoxia vs standard, was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier statistics.ResultsA total of 223 patients were operated in the analyzed period, 129 receiving <50% perioperative oxygen and 94 receiving 80%. Mean duration of follow-up from surgery was 2.2 (1.1 u2013 3.3) yr. No significant differences between groups were observed for cancer staging, ASA status, demographic and surgical variables. Mortality rate at the end of follow-up was 14% in hyperoxia group versus 19% in group control (p=0.6). Kaplan-Meier survival curve did not show significant differences between both groups.ConclusionsIn our patients scheduled for elective CRS, mortality was similar in spite of the FiO2 received. These findings suggest that hyperoxia could be used until more evidence is available.References:1.tHovaguimian F et al. Anesthesiology 2013;119:303-162.tMeyhoff CS et al. Anesth Analg.2012;115(4):849-54.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.