Nintedanib plus Docetaxel after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Failure in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Series

Résumé fourni par la source

Advances in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) lacking an actionable driver mutation have included the approval of immunotherapies, such as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. However, limited evidence exists to guide clinical decision-making after progression with immunotherapy. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway promotes tumor angiogenesis and the development of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Anti-VEGF treatment is postulated to favor an immunosupportive TME through an "angio-immunogenic switch." Nintedanib, an anti-VEGF receptor treatment, is approved in the EU and other countries, in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of locally advanced, metastatic, or locally recurrent adenocarcinoma NSCLC after failure of first-line chemotherapy. We present a case series from 5 patients treated with nintedanib plus docetaxel, after chemotherapy and immunotherapy, during routine clinical practice in Austria and Hungary. Four patients were treated with nintedanib plus docetaxel as a second- or third-line treatment after chemotherapy and immunotherapy, and a fifth patient received immunotherapy before and after nintedanib plus docetaxel. Although these patients would typically have a poor prognosis, each achieved a partial response with nintedanib plus docetaxel, with response duration from 8 months to over 30 months. Adverse events were manageable. The fifth patient case shows that nintedanib does not preclude later-line immunotherapy or chemotherapy, supporting the angio-immunogenic switch hypothesis. Overall, the case studies indicate that nintedanib plus docetaxel is an effective and well tolerated treatment, after sequential or combined chemo-immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC, and is compatible with a rechallenge with immunotherapy.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.