Egyptian renal data system (ERDS) 2020
Résumé fourni par la source
A patient registry is the collection of uniform data (clinical and others) to evaluate specified outcomes for a population defined by a particular disease or therapy (target disease or therapy) and that serves one or more predetermined scientific, clinical, or policy purposes. Our aim is to establish a renal database for hemodialysis patients (as a first step) that would help in providing the optimal health care to improve quality of life and prolong survival. Egyptian renal data system (ERDS) was established out of the firm belief that delivering a clear picture of the incidence, prevalence, and outcomes of hemodialysis-related problems in Egypt is the needed action to identify the real magnitude of the problem. ERDS is the Egyptian national registry of nephrology patients. It was founded and is run by the Egyptian Society of Nephrology and Transplantation (ESNT), the only official Egyptian Non-Governmental Organization representing nephrologists and officially managing some issues of the nephrology specialty in Egypt. ERDS until now registers data about patients with End stage kidney disease (ESKD) on chronic hemodialysis, but the plan is to include more patient groups in the future. Two types of data were collected; data about the dialysis units as a whole and data specific to each patient. Data entered by all units were exported from the digital system as a.csv file that can be opened by Microsoft Excel. Data analysis was carried out by Microsoft Excel functions and Microsoft Power Business Intelligence. Results were represented by different sectors.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Egyptian renal data system (ERDS) 2020
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2022
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.