Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2022 article

Definitions and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer according to multidisciplinary tumour boards in Europe

44Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
66Institutions déclarées
17Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Consensus about the definition and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the definition and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer across multidisciplinary tumour boards (MDTs) in Europe. MATERIAL AND METHODS: European expert centers (n = 49) were requested to discuss 15 real-life cases in their MDT with at least a medical, surgical, and radiation oncologist present. The cases varied in terms of location and number of metastases, histology, timing of detection (i.e. synchronous versus metachronous), primary tumour treatment status, and response to systemic therapy. The primary outcome was the agreement in the definition of oligometastatic disease at diagnosis and after systemic therapy. The secondary outcome was the agreement in treatment strategies. Treatment strategies for oligometastatic disease were categorised into upfront local treatment (i.e. metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy), systemic therapy followed by restaging to consider local treatment or systemic therapy alone. The agreement across MDTs was scored to be either absent/poor (<50%), fair (50%-75%), or consensus (≥75%). RESULTS: A total of 47 MDTs across 16 countries fully discussed the cases (96%). Oligometastatic disease was considered in patients with 1-2 metastases in either the liver, lung, retroperitoneal lymph nodes, adrenal gland, soft tissue or bone (consensus). At follow-up, oligometastatic disease was considered after a median of 18 weeks of systemic therapy when no progression or progression in size only of the oligometastatic lesion(s) was seen (consensus). If at restaging after a median of 18 weeks of systemic therapy the number of lesions progressed, this was not considered as oligometastatic disease (fair agreement). There was no consensus on treatment strategies for oligometastatic disease. CONCLUSION: A broad consensus on definitions of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer was found among MDTs of oesophagogastric cancer expert centres in Europe. However, high practice variability in treatment strategies exists.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Definitions and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer according to multidisciplinary tumour boards in Europe
Date Crossref
01/03/2022
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Utrecht UniversityUniversity Medical Center UtrechtMedical University of ViennaGhent University HospitalKU LeuvenMasaryk UniversityMasaryk Memorial Cancer InstituteAarhus UniversityOdense University HospitalUniversity College LondonCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of LondonImperial College LondonNorfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustRoyal Marsden HospitalTallinn UniversityHôpital Claude HuriezUniversity Children's Hospital TübingenUniversity of TübingenUniversity of CologneUniversity Hospital CologneJohannes Gutenberg University MainzNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensTrinity College DublinUniversity of BolognaVita-Salute San Raffaele UniversityHumanitas UniversityAgostino Gemelli University PolyclinicUniversity of SienaUniversity of VeronaAmsterdam University Medical CentersThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenLeiden University Medical CenterRadboud University NijmegenCatharina ZiekenhuisErasmus MCElisabeth-TweeSteden ZiekenhuisJagiellonian UniversityMedical University of LublinVall d'Hebron Hospital UniversitariVall d'Hebron Institute of OncologyUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaUniversitat de ValènciaHospital Clínico Universitario de ValenciaKarolinska University HospitalKarolinska InstitutetUniversity of ZurichUniversity Hospital ZurichUniversity of GenevaUniversity of LausanneNational Institute of OncologyThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of OncologyMaastricht University Medical CentreMaastro ClinicUniversity Hospital LeipzigLeipzig UniversityUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustQueen Elizabeth Hospital BirminghamNIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research CentreUniversity of BirminghamRadboud University Medical CenterUniversity of AmsterdamErasmus University RotterdamNetherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Esophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesHead and Neck Cancer Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.