Recipient obesity as a risk factor in kidney transplantation

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of recipient obesity on the short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing primary kidney transplantation (KT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: ; N = 69) groups. Their clinicopathological characteristics, outcomes, and survival rates were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Obesity was associated with an increased rate of surgical complications such as wound infection (P < 0.001), fascial dehiscence (P = 0.023), and lymphoceles (P = 0.010). Furthermore, the hospital stay duration was significantly longer in the groups with obese patients compared to normal weight and overweight patients (normal weight: 22 days, overweight: 25 days, and obese: 33 days, respectively; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that recipient obesity (BMI ≥ 30) was an independent prognostic factor for delayed graft function (DGF) (OR 2.400; 95% CI, 1.365-4.219; P = 0.002) and postoperative surgical complications (OR 2.514; 95% CI, 1.230-5.136; P = 0.011). The mean death-censored graft survival was significantly lower in obese patients (normal weight: 16.3 ± 0.6 years, overweight: 16.3 ± 0.8 years, obese 10.8 ± 1.5 years, respectively; P = 0.001). However, when using the Cox proportional hazards model, the association between recipient obesity and death-censored renal graft failure disappeared, after adjustment for important covariates, whereas the principal independent predictors of graft loss were recipient diabetes mellitus and hypertension and kidneys from donors with expanded donor criteria. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, obesity increases the risk of DGF and post-operative surgical complications after primary KT. Appropriate risk-adapted information concerning this must be provided to such patients before KT. Furthermore, obesity-typical concomitant diseases seem to negatively influence graft survival and need to be considered after the transplantation of obese patients.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.