Isolation and Characterization of Escherichia albertii from Retail Meats and Vegetables in Akita Prefecture, Japan
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Escherichia albertii is a newly emerging food-borne pathogen; however, little is known about the infection routes to patients. The aim of this study was to isolate and characterize E. albertii from retail meats and vegetables in Akita Prefecture of Japan. A total of 12 E. albertii strains were isolated from five retail meats, including a chicken meat, two chicken giblets, and two pork offals, and seven vegetables, including three samples of Japanese parsley, Mitsuba, Mizu (Elatostema umbellata), watercress, and cucumber. The results of O-genotyping showed that 10 isolates were shared by eight other O-genotypes and two isolates were untypable. Biochemical proporties and virulence genes of isolates were similar to those of E. albertii strains of human and environmental water origin. Only two isolates from pork offals were non-susceptible against streptomycin and/or tetracycline. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis showed that some isolates from vegetables were included together human or environmental water strains in clusters at >80% similarity. Our results suggest that vegetables, in addtion to meats, are important as the source of E. albertii infection to humans.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Isolation and Characterization of <i>Escherichia albertii</i> from Retail Meats and Vegetables in Akita Prefecture, Japan 秋田県内で市販されている食肉および野菜類からの<i>Escherichia albertii</i>の検出と分離株の性状
- Date Crossref
- 31/12/2021
- Éditeur
- Japanese Society of Food Microbiology
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.