Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2021 article

Genetic diversity and relationship between wild and cultivated cowpea [ Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] as assessed by allozyme markers

3Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : Cameroun, Kenya, fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract In Cameroon, cowpea plays an important role in traditional agroecosystems. Genetic variation in wild and cultivated cowpea in Cameroon has not yet been documented. Allozyme markers because of their codominance and polymorphism are useful tools for studying genetic variation and disparity in plant species. The present study was undertaken to elucidate the relationship between wild and cultivated cowpea from Cameroon. Ten enzyme systems encoding nineteen isozyme loci were used on 62 cowpea germplasm (45 wild and 17 cultivated). A total of thirty-two alleles were found. One allele was only found in cultivated samples ( Enp 98 ). Eight alleles were specific only to wild plant ( Amp 2 98 , Amp 3a 103 , Amp 4 96 , Fdh 104 , Idh 2 95 , Pgi 3 92 , Pgm 2 95 and Sdh 95 ). Twenty-three alleles were common to both wild and cultivated accessions. Amp 2 10 2 (z = −4.633, p < 0.001) and Fle 3 96 (z = −2.858, p < 0.010) were significantly more represented in cultivated compared to wild cowpea forms. The mean number of alleles per locus in wild (1.632 alleles/locus) cowpea were significantly higher (t = 2.805, p < 0.010) compared to cultivated (1.263 alleles/locus) cowpea. Also, the proportion of polymorphic loci (P = 52.63%) and average Nei’s genetic diversity (He = 0.126) were important in wild, compared to the cultivated plants: P = 26.31% and He = 0.063, respectively. The low level of diversity found in domesticated accessions compared to wild can be attributed to a major genetic bottleneck that probably happened during the domestication process. Cluster analysis revealed by UPGMA dendrogram separated the 62 accessions into three clusters. Although an admixture of both wild and cultivated accessions within the same cluster were found, the dendogram, however, highlighted a visible separation between wild and cultivated cowpea. Wild cowpea with many more private alleles indicates an untouched resource available for future breeding.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.

Titre Crossref
Genetic diversity and relationship between wild and cultivated cowpea [ <i>Vigna unguiculata</i> (L.) Walp.] as assessed by allozyme markers
Date Crossref
01/01/2021
Éditeur
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Agricultural pest management studiesGenetic and Environmental Crop StudiesLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.