Considerations for the real‐world management of ARIA from the aducanumab phase 3 studies EMERGE and ENGAGE
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background Amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), a spectrum of imaging findings detected on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are associated with the investigational use of amyloid‐targeting monoclonal antibodies, including aducanumab, in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). EMERGE (NCT02484547) and ENGAGE (NCT02477800) were Phase 3 studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of aducanumab in patients with early AD. Methods ARIA risk minimization included dose titration, routine brain MRI monitoring, ad hoc MRI testing as clinically indicated, and among patients who developed ARIA, possible dose suspension or permanent discontinuation. The criteria for dose suspension or discontinuation were based on the radiographic severity of ARIA and presentation of clinical symptoms. On detection of an ARIA episode, follow‐up MRIs were conducted approximately every 4 weeks to document radiographic resolution of ARIA‐edema (ARIA‐E) or stabilization of ARIA‐hemorrhage (ARIA‐H), which refers to brain microhemorrhages and localized superficial siderosis. Results The integrated data set from EMERGE and ENGAGE consisted of 3285 participants (aducanumab treated, n=2198; placebo treated, n=1087). In the 10‐mg/kg group (n=1029 with ≥1 postbaseline MRI), ARIA‐E was the most common adverse event (35.2%), with a higher incidence in apolipoprotein ε4 carriers compared with noncarriers (43.0% versus 20.3%, respectively). Radiographic severity of ARIA‐E was characterized as mild (30.1%), moderate (57.7%), or severe (12.2%). ARIA‐E typically occurred within the first 32 weeks of treatment with aducanumab and were mostly asymptomatic (74.0%). Among participants who reported symptoms in the setting of ARIA, the majority of symptoms during ARIA were characterized as mild (67.7%) or moderate (28.3); the most common symptoms were headache (46.6%), confusion (14.6%), dizziness (10.7%), and nausea (7.8%). ARIA‐E were transient but recurred in 10.6% of participants in the 10‐mg/kg group. ARIA‐H microhemorrhage and superficial siderosis were typically asymptomatic and more common in participants who had ARIA‐E (40.3% and 38.7%, respectively), compared with participants without ARIA‐E (7.6% and 1.6%, respectively). In participants with ARIA‐E and ARIA‐H, these events frequently overlapped temporally. There were no fatal events due to ARIA. Conclusions ARIA are mostly asymptomatic; evidence supports the use of routine brain MRI to monitor for events in clinical practice.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Considerations for the real‐world management of ARIA from the aducanumab phase 3 studies EMERGE and ENGAGE
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2021
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Biogen (United States) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
BioClinica (United States) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
California Pacific Medical Center pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Biogen Cambridge MA USA pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Bioclinica Newark CA USA pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Biogen (United States), BioClinica (United States) et California Pacific Medical Center, avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.