Elder Mistreatment Methods and Measures in Round 3 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: Elder mistreatment has negative consequences for older adults' health and well-being. As such, scholars aim to understand its causes, the contexts in which it occurs, how to prevent victimization, and how to design interventions for mistreated older adults. This paper provides a detailed overview of the 2015-2016 National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP) Round 3 Elder Mistreatment Module (EMM) to encourage further research on the topic. METHOD: This paper reviews previous elder mistreatment scholarship, describes the EMM, provides descriptive analyses of elder mistreatment among community-dwelling older adults, and discusses promising approaches and limitations to future research with these data. RESULTS: The EMM includes 10 stem questions to measure elder mistreatment behaviors experienced since age 60 and 2 follow-up questions about perceived severity and the identity of the perpetrator. The stem questions can be analyzed individually or combined into a scale, and researchers can account for severity as a robustness check. Analysts can also group the measures into specific types of elder mistreatment. A major strength of the EMM is its ability to identify perpetrators in victims' core social networks. DISCUSSION: The NSHAP Round 3 EMM provides scholars an opportunity to study older Americans' mistreatment experiences, particularly as they relate to their physical and mental health, their social networks and personal relationships, and their broader social contexts.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Elder Mistreatment Methods and Measures in Round 3 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2021
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of South Carolina Department of Sociology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Chicago Academic Research Centers pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Centers for New Horizons pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
-
National Opinion Research Center pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
-
Chicago Department of Public Health pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Rush University Medical Center pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Department of Sociology — University of South Carolina, Academic Research Centers — University of Chicago et Centers for New Horizons, avec 3 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.