Diagnostic Sensitivity of Plasma Endothelin-1 for Cerebral Vasospasm After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, a Multicentre Double-Blind Study
Rattachement africain : au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The purpose of this study is to establish the diagnostic sensitivity of Endothelin-1 for risk stratification and screening of clinical vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. This is a multicentre, observational study, correlating daily blood Endothelin-1 with clinical variables. Binary logistic regression used to examine if Endothelin-1 levels could be used to predict clinical vasospasm. Bivariate modelling used to explore associations between patient characteristics and vasospasm. A Receiver Operating Curve used to explore cut-off values for Endothelin-1. Sensitivity and specificity was used to validate the cut-point found in the pilot study. A total of 96 patients were enrolled over two years. Median Endothelin-1 was higher for patients who experienced clinical vasospasm except for day-5, where median endothelin for patients without vasospasm was higher (3.6 IQR = 5.3), compared to patients with vasospasm (3.3 IQR = 8.5) although differences were not significant. The Receiver Operating Curve analysis confirmed that day-5 Endothelin-1 was not a good indicator of vasospasm, with an area under the curve of 0.506 (95% CI: 0.350-0.663, p = 0.938). The levels of Endothelin-1 in blood do not discriminate patients who may develop symptomatic vasospasm. The high variability in Endothelin-1 levels, aligns with the pathophysiological variability of most biomarkers, decreasing their ability to predict a clinical event.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Diagnostic Sensitivity of Plasma Endothelin-1 for Cerebral Vasospasm After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, a Multicentre Double-Blind Study
- Date Crossref
- 13/12/2021
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.