Zika virus-specific IgM elicited during pregnancy exhibits ultrapotent neutralization
Rattachement africain : kr, us, br, sg, py, pt. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Summary Congenital Zika virus (ZIKV) infection results in neurodevelopmental deficits in up to 14% of infants born to ZIKV-infected mothers. Neutralizing antibodies are a critical component of protective immunity. Here, we demonstrate that plasma IgM responses contribute to ZIKV immunity in pregnancy, mediating neutralization up to three months post symptoms. From a ZIKV-infected pregnant woman, we established a B cell line secreting a pentameric ZIKV-specific IgM (DH1017.IgM) that exhibited ultrapotent ZIKV neutralization dependent on the IgM isotype. DH1017.IgM targets a novel envelope dimer epitope within Domain II. The arrangement of this epitope on the virion is compatible with concurrent engagement of all ten antigen-binding sites of DH1017.IgM, a solution not achievable by IgG antibodies. DH1017.IgM protected against lethal ZIKV challenge in mice. Our findings identify a unique role of antibodies of the IgM isotype in protection against ZIKV and posit DH1017.IgM as a safe and effective candidate immunoprophylactic, particularly during pregnancy. Key points Plasma IgM contributes to early ZIKV neutralization during pregnancy Ultrapotent neutralization by pentameric DH1017.IgM mAb depends on isotype DH1017.IgM can engage all binding sites concurrently through different angles of approach DH1017.IgM protects mice against lethal ZIKV challenge
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Zika virus-specific IgM elicited during pregnancy exhibits ultrapotent neutralization
- Date Crossref
- 23/11/2021
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.