Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2021 article

Research Knowledge Translation Activities in Africa; An Outlook of the Opportunities and Obstacles

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
4Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : Kenya, Malawi, Rwanda, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Health systems have failed globally to use research evidence optimally in view of ineffective knowledge translation. Knowledge translation is the effective and timely incorporation of evidence-based information into the practices of health professionals to effect optimal health outcomes. With the growing demands on health care resources and accountability, greater emphasis is being placed on generating knowledge that can have a practical impact on decision making. This review gives an outlook of the opportunities and obstacles to knowledge translation in African context. We searched for articles published in English on the World Health Organization website, peer reviewed articles on Google Scholar, PubMed and Science Direct databases search engines since 2000 in Sub-Saharan Africa A total of 3,020 papers were analyzed and the outcomes reported. The knowledge transfer literature in African countries is widely distributed, problematically diverse and growing. However, significant disparities exist between reports in different countries while there are many settings without published evidence of local knowledge translation. Our review also highlighted the lack of meaningful investment and follow up after research findings. Barriers affecting knowledge translation includes insufficient skills and capacity to conduct knowledge transfer activities, time constraints and a lack of resources. We identified substantial geographical gaps in knowledge translation and evidence that need to boost local research capacities in Africa. Evidence mapping is a useful approach that can assist local decision-making to enhance knowledge transfer into a policy. We recommend the inclusion of knowledge translation advisors who are the advocates of the knowledge translation during protocol development.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Research Knowledge Translation Activities in Africa; An Outlook of the Opportunities and Obstacles
Date Crossref
01/01/2021
Éditeur
International Journal of Scientific Advances
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationEthics in Clinical Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.