TP9.2.17Developing Novel Referral Pathways in Emergency Surgery

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Introduction In line with the principles of GIRFT and recognising the demand on the Emergency Department (ED) the Acute Surgical Unit (ASU) developed a direct admission pathway entitled ‘ASU Direct’ (ASUD). Nurse led ED triage with adherence to a referral proforma allows direct admission of suitable surgical patients eliminating medical ED review or discussion with the on-call Registrar. Aim Investigate the usefulness of the ASUD pathway and adherence to admission criteria. Method Two retrospective audits of ASUD referrals were completed and compared with concurrent traditional registrar referrals. Inter-departmental discussions occurred between audit cycles. Results Audit 1: 13 days, 150 cases (8 excluded). 75 (53%) referred via ASUD, 67 (47%) via surgical registrar. Sixteen ASUD cases (22%) breached pathway protocols including 3 young women referred without pregnancy tests. Seventeen (25%) cases referred via the Registrar fulfilled ASUD criteria. Documentation complete in 56% of ASUD cases. Audit 2: (3 weeks after feedback) - 10 days, 120 patients (25 excluded). Fifty one ASUD cases (54%) and 44 (46%) registrar referrals. 24% cases breached ASUD criteria, 7 registrar referrals (15%) appropriate for ASUD. ASUD documentation completed in 60% with 100% pregnancy status recorded. Conclusions Proportion of ASUD / registrar referrals remained constant but there were fewer missed opportunities for ASUD. Inappropriate ASUD admissions remained similar. While ASUD worked well for visible pathology, less-so for protocol-driven abdominal pain. Senior ‘front-door’ triage in ED might improve protocol compliance, helping to develop such pathways, observing GIRFT and avoid unnecessary transfer of patients (especially during the COVID pandemic).

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.