Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2021 article

TP5.2.4 Patency of radiocephalic versus brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula in a major tertiary hospital

2Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : au, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Introduction The patency of brachiocephalic fistulae is generally considered to be superior to radiocephalic fistulae. We have explored this in a major tertiary hospital. Method This was a retrospective review of fistulae created between 1st January 2015 and 31st July 2020. Index cases were identified from a prospectively maintained vascular access database. Patient demographics, procedure details and subsequent interventions are described. Results There were 915 fistulae created on 813 patients (528 males and 285 females). There were 388 radiocephalic fistulae created on 374 patients and 363 brachiocephalic fistulae were formed on 301 patients. Both groups had 315 fistulae with patency data available. Age and a diagnosis of diabetes were comparable. There were significantly fewer female patients in the radiocephalic cohort (p = 0.004). Primary patency at 3 months, 1 year and 3 years were 84.6%, 58.1% and 37.9% for radiocephalic and 87.9%, 63.1% and 37.0% for brachiocephalic fistula (p = 0.273). Primary assisted patency at 3 months, 1 year and 3 years were 92.3%, 87.0%, 77.4% for radiocephalic and 96.1%, 88.6%, 79.9% for brachiocephalic fistulas (p = 0.295). Secondary patency at 3 months, 1 year and 3 years were 93.3%, 88.3% and 81.5% for radiocephalic fistulas and 97.4%, 90.6% and 85.7% for brachiocephalic fistulas (p = 0.134). Conclusion We have demonstrated similar primary, primary-assisted and secondary patency for radiocephalic and brachiocephalic fistulae. Pre-operative ultrasound vein mapping, selective ultrasound surveillance, surgical expertise and careful patient selection may contribute to the high secondary patency and absence of difference between the groups.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
TP5.2.4 Patency of radiocephalic versus brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula in a major tertiary hospital
Date Crossref
01/10/2021
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Central Venous Catheters and HemodialysisAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementVascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.