Prognostic Value of Cardiac Troponin I In Infective Endocarditis

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Aim The aim of this study is to assess the prognostic value of cardiac troponin I as a predictor of in-hospital morbidity and mortality in patients with infective endocarditis. Methods This study included 48 patients with definite and possible IE according to modified Duke’s criteria for diagnosis of IE. This prospective longitudinal study was conducted on patients admitted to the cardiovascular department of Cairo University hospitals. All patients were subjected to full history taking and clinical examination, all laboratory and radiological investigations which included chest radiography, echocardiogram and other diagnostic procedures as needed for diagnosis and follow-up of IE were done with emphasis on cardiac troponin I level on admission. Results Troponin I was found to be statistically significant predictor for heart failure (NYHA III/IV), septic pulmonary embolism and in-hospital mortality in infective endocarditis patients by univariate and multivariate regression analysis with P values 0.023, 0.037and 0.002 respectively. Tricuspid valve vegetations had showed significant relation to troponin I levels with p value 0.033. Also it was found that SOFA score on first day of admission showed significant relation to troponin I level with P value 0.045 and 0.004 for prediction of hospital stay duration. Shock and intracranial hemorrhage showed borderline significance with P values 0.097, 0.069. On other hand, troponin I as predictor of pulmonary edema, mechanical complications, systemic embolization, acute kidney injury and presence of aortic root abscess had no statistical significance in our studied patients. Conclusions This study showed that there is as significant predictive value of elevated cardiac troponin I with heart failure, septic pulmonary embolism and all cause in-hospital mortality. In addition, it was significant predictor of the length of hospital stay, lymphocytosis and SOFA score. These results are emphasizing that cTn I level may predict higher risk patients who would need early and aggressive control of infection medically alone or combined with surgery in IE patients.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.