Effectiveness of a community-delivered pneumatic machine resistance training programme (Gym Tonic) for older adults at neighbourhood senior centres – a randomized controlled trial
Rattachement africain : sg, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Resistance training with pneumatic machines attenuates the age-associated loss in muscle strength and function in older adults. However, effectiveness of scaled-up pneumatic machine resistance training in the community is not known. We evaluated the effectiveness of a multi-site community-delivered 12-week pneumatic machine resistance programme (Gym Tonic (GT)) on muscle strength and physical function in older adults. METHODS: Three hundred eighteen community-dwelling older adults aged ≥65 years were randomized into 12-week (twice/week) coach-supervised-community-based-GT-programme(n = 168) and wait-list control groups(n = 150). After 12 weeks, the intervention group continued with GT-training and the control group received supervised-GT-programme for further 12 weeks (partial-crossover-design). Fried frailty score, lower-extremity muscle strength and physical function (i.e., fast and habitual gait-speed, balance, repeated-chair-sit-to-stand, short physical performance battery (SPPB)) were determined at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks. Analysis adopted a modified-intention-to-treat-approach. RESULTS: After 12 weeks, lower-extremity muscle strength improved by 11-26%(all p < 0.05) and fast gait-speed improved by 7%(p = 0.008) in GT-intervention group(n = 132) than controls(n = 118), regardless of frailty status. Other physical function performance did not differ between control and intervention groups after 12 weeks (all p > 0.05). Frailty score improved by 0.5 in the intervention but not control group(p = 0.004). Within the intervention group, lower-extremity muscle strength and physical function outcomes improved at 24 weeks compared with baseline (all p < 0.001). Within controls, lower-extremity muscle strength, SPPB, repeated-chair-sit-to-stand and fast gait-speed improved post-GT (24-week) compared to both pre-GT (12-week) and baseline. Programme adherence was high in intervention [0-12-weeks,90%(SD,13%); 12-24-weeks,89%(SD,17%)] and control [12-24-weeks,90%(SD,19%)] groups. CONCLUSION: Community-delivered GT resistance training programme with pneumatic machines has high adherence, improves muscle strength and fast gait-speed, and can be effectively implemented at scale for older adults. Future studies could examine if including other multi-modal function-specific training to complement GT can achieve better physical/functional performance in power, balance and endurance tasks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04661618 , Registered 10 December 2020 - Retrospectively registered.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Effectiveness of a community-delivered pneumatic machine resistance training programme (Gym Tonic) for older adults at neighbourhood senior centres – a randomized controlled trial
- Date Crossref
- 07/10/2021
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Singapore Institute of Technology Health and Social Sciences Cluster pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Glasgow Caledonian University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Geriatric Education and Research Institute pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
PulseSync Pte Ltd pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
School of Health and Life Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Health and Social Sciences Cluster — Singapore Institute of Technology, Glasgow Caledonian University et Geriatric Education and Research Institute, avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.