Fournier’s Gangrene in Patients with Oncohematological Diseases: A Systematic Review of Published Cases
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Patients suffering from hematological malignancies are at increased risk of Fournier’s gangrene (FG) due to immunosuppression caused by the disease itself or by disease-related treatments. A systematic review of PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Scopus databases was performed in June 2021. We included full papers that met the following criteria: original research, human studies, and describing clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes of FG in patients with oncohematological diseases. We identified 35 papers published from 1983 to 2021 involving 44 patients (34 males, 8 females) aged between 4 days and 83 years. The most common malignant hematological disorders were acute myeloid leukemia (n = 21) and acute lymphocytic leukemia (n = 9). In 10 patients FG represented the first presentation of hematological malignancy. Scrotum (n= 27) and perineum (n = 11) were the sites most commonly involved. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 21) and Escherichia coli (n = 6) were the most commonly isolated microorganisms. Surgery was performed in 39 patients. Vacuum-assisted closure and hyperbaric oxygen therapy were adopted in 4 and in 3 patients, respectively. Recovery was achieved in 30 patients. FG-related mortality was observed in 11 patients. FG should be carefully considered in patients with oncohematological diseases.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Fournier’s Gangrene in Patients with Oncohematological Diseases: A Systematic Review of Published Cases
- Date Crossref
- 30/08/2021
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.