Botulinum toxin treatment for difficult-to-treat finger pressure ulcers caused by severe hand flexion: case report
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
We report the successful treatment of two cases of difficult-to-treat pressure ulcers with botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A). A 71-year-old male patient with Parkinson's disease presented with severe hand grip deformities of the fingers and a pressure ulcer (PU) on the right hand. He received 240U of BoNT-A into the upper limb muscles, which improved finger mobility during passive extension and resulted in resolution of the palm PU. No recurrence was noted. A 69-year-old female patient with Lewy body dementia presented with a PU on the palm side of the middle finger apex of the right hand, with exposure of the phalanx bone and dark red oedematous granulation of the tip of the finger. Severe muscle tone was noted. She received 240U of BoNT-A injected into the muscles of the upper extremities. This resulted in the disappearance of the contracture between the middle finger cusp and palm, and prompt healing of the PU. A protective finger orthosis was also used to improve hand finger grip and prevent further PUs. Although BoNT-A injection resulted in only slight improvement in the range of motion, it produced relief of pressure with consequent healing of the PU. Injection of BoNT-A into the affected muscles of the patients in this case report was effective in reducing flexor muscle tone, relief of pressure on the palm skin and healing of hand PUs.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Botulinum toxin treatment for difficult-to-treat finger pressure ulcers caused by severe hand flexion: case report
- Date Crossref
- 02/08/2021
- Éditeur
- Mark Allen Group
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.